Here are a couple of posts from another site. I posed a question in relation to an answer given about Machine Readable Passports and was given this answer by a moderator on there.
Is this correct?? Opinions please...
<blockquote id='quote' class='ffs'>quote:Quote:
Under current US legislation, if you have a Machine Readable Passport which does not have a digital photograph, then it is valid for visa free travel to the US up until 26 October 2006.
My passport is machine readable and was issued in 1998.
My wife and daughter both have passports issued in 2003 and have embossed signatures and a hologram on the photo.
Mine was fine this year but i am now a bit concerned as we are booked to travel in December 2006 and i had previously been led to believe that as long as it was machine readable i would be okay until it needed renewing.
Is this not so?</blockquote id='quote'>
<blockquote id='quote' class='ffs'>quote:Hi ujpest doza ... the UK Passport Agency introduced digital photographs in 1998. I'm not sure of the exact date, but obviously your situation depends on whether the passport was issued before or after the introduction of digital images.
If your passport contains a digital image which has been scanned into the passport, then you are okay for travel to the US in December 2006.
But if it contains the actual photo, rather than a digital reproduction, it is valid for entry to the US only until October 2006.
David </blockquote id='quote'>
Bookmarks