Why Nostromo?
If we abolished our Monarchy it would be a big kiss of death for our tourist trade. You have to keep what works for the Country.
hear hear carla [clap][clap][clap][clap]
Why Nostromo?
If we abolished our Monarchy it would be a big kiss of death for our tourist trade. You have to keep what works for the Country.
hear hear carla [clap][clap][clap][clap]
I never liked Diana, she used the press and others to her own advantage. She was never very stable I don't think.
I don't think Charles should have married her though it was not fair on her!
CDV
No he shouldnt have married her!!!pick on the little shy girl change her, but it back fired she turned into a beautiful woman!! with a mind of her own!!!!!!!!!!!
i loved her!!
Liesa
good luck to them, after all there has never really been anyone else for Charles.
Charles married Diana because he/the monarchy/government/establishment etc. etc. had to find someone with no sexual past who could give him heirs!!! It was hardly a marriage made in heaven or a meeting of minds. It looks as though Diana wanted the entire fairy tale but that was never going to happen.
He was in love with Camilla years before he married Diana, but he wasn't her first, so they were not allowed to marry each other. The Establishment should have learnt their lesson when they meddled with Margaret's love life but obviously they hadn't.
Let's hope that we have moved on enough now so that we don't force the same debacle onto William, when he wants to marry.
Carla
<blockquote id="quote" class="ffs">quote:Originally posted by Carla
Charles married Diana because he/the monarchy/government/establishment etc. etc. had to find someone with no sexual past who could give him heirs!!! It was hardly a marriage made in heaven or a meeting of minds. It looks as though Diana wanted the entire fairy tale but that was never going to happen.
He was in love with Camilla years before he married Diana, but he wasn't her first, so they were not allowed to marry each other. The Establishment should have learnt their lesson when they meddled with Margaret's love life but obviously they hadn't.
Let's hope that we have moved on enough now so that we don't force the same debacle onto William, when he wants to marry.
[/quote]In that case then, someone should have made it perfectly clear to Diana that she was getting married just to be a baby/heir factory and just a token wife as she obviously thought of it rather differently. I'm glad I wasn't in her shoes when she found out!
Surely everyone who's been married can imagine themselves finding out that their husband was having an affair and was in love with someone else all the time - would that make you mad? It sure as hell would make me very mad and I think it's unforgiveable! [}] You'd sit idly by then Carla and wish Kevin well if it had happened to you?
blott
No wonder Blair's office leaked the news. If there is an election in April/May this will take minds away from politics and he won't have to answer any more awkward questions to do with the war on Iraq, the economy, immigration et al.
Of course she was a baby factory Blott!! Why does that surprise you? The monarchy needed heirs and they had to trawl around for someone to give those heirs. She was hardly the first girl in that position either. Didn't she ever read any history books?? She must have been the only one who didn't realise why a man of his age was courting an 18 year old with minimal life experience. I was 26 when they married and it was obvious what she was there for, hence William and Harry arriving quite quickly.
Carla
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks